Post by John NagelsonPost by "NightjarPost by John NagelsonPost by John NagelsonHi, my mother's house occasionally smells slightly of gas, and has
done for about 20 years, so it's obvious there's a leak somewhere.
Yesterday my sister called the "Smell Gas? Call us for Free" number
that's advertised all over the place by practically every company in
the industry - presumably centrally-funded. A gas guy came, found a
leak in one room and disconnected the fire there (which hasn't been
used for years). Then he sucked on his teeth and said that that hadn't
fixed the problem, and disconnected the entire supply at the mains,
and gave my mother a piece of paper to say she'd be committing a
offence if she turned it back on again.
He also said that if it were his house, he'd change everything, which
is of course the oldest way in the book of recommending that a lot of
work be done without saying in writing that he's carried out an
inspection, found the following faults, and recommends that these
specific things be done. Yes mate, sure.
I've just read his scrawled note, which reads "Smell of gas at fire,
Disconect [sic], Retest (so that) still leaking Cap at meter".
Not sure about the "so that" - it might say something else.
Does this mean he has capped a pipe close to the meter? (If so, does
this mean actual plumbing work, or just turning it off?) Or does it
mean he found a leak at the meter? (In the latter case, presumably the
supplier will pay, since they - or some other company - own the
meter?)
It means he has undone a connection, inserted a capping disk and done
the connection up again.
Thanks for this info. That actually sounds like something I wouldn't
want
to fiddle with, but I'll have to research the matter. Don't worry - I
won't
let my anger cause me to put my mother at risk.
Post by "NightjarThat is to prevent people who think they know
better simply turning the gas tap back on again.
The bastard. I'm going to fix my mother's banister next week. It's
been a bit
wobbly for years. Maybe the guy should have built a wall across her
stairway
and set a booby-trap to prevent me from removing it?
I think you need to take a step back and think about this a bit more
rationally. It sounds like your mother contacted Transco on their
emergency "Smell Gas" number... If this is the case they will send
someone to the property quickly to ascertain if there is indeed a leak,
and if so where it is. If they find a leak at the meter or in the
pipework before the meter (i.e. the bits of the system for which they
are responsible), then they will fix free of charge.
If however they find a leak in the consumers property, then the correct
and *only* safe thing to do is to isolate the property and recommend
that they get a gas engineer in to remedy the problem, since they are
not responsible for the consumers side of the installation, and not
supposed to fiddle with it.
If having detected a leak, he were to leave the property without having
made it safe, and the following day your mother was killed in a gas
explosion, then the engineer would be guilty of, at best, gross
negligence, and more likely manslaughter.
Now it sounds like in this case the bloke in question has in fact gone
far beyond what he was actually required to do in this case, and has
made an attempt to find and rectify the fault in the customers
installation. For this you ought to be grateful since he is going beyond
his remit and presumably not even being paid for it. As a transco
engineer, he is not in a position to quote for the work, or undertake to
fix it - so suggesting that there is some financial gain to be had seems
daft.
Post by John NagelsonHe told her if he lived in the house, the first thing he'd do would be
to get
"all the pipework" changed. "There's loads of it under the
floorboards," he said.
"Who knows where the leak is?" he asked.
That's scammers' talk.
Or its the talk of someone who has looked at a house and noted that much
of the pipework is very old, consists of lots of disused and capped
runs in steel pipe with screw thread connections - possibly even in a
property that used to have gas lighting.
It may be he observed that there is in fact only one or two appliances
actually being used, in spite of the large network of pipes that run all
over the house.
Post by John Nagelson"If I were you" is the oldest persuasion technique in the business.
Most of the pipes go to fires that haven't been used for decades. She
only
needs gas at the boiler and cooker. Whatever problem there might be,
she doesn't need "all the pipework" changed.
Its sounds like that is *exactly* what is needed - but I suspect you are
not understanding what is being suggested.
He was probably suggesting that new pipework be installed to the two
appliances that are actually in use, and the entire existing system
disconnected and abandoned. This would be (by far) the cheapest an
quickest way of rectifying the problem.
Post by John NagelsonPost by "NightjarPeter says, if you
think it has been wrongly disconnected, get a second opinion; don't just
turn the gas back on again. The fact that it has smelt of gas for 20
years does not mean it is safe, merely that your mother has been lucky
so far.
Please let's not get into logical arguments. The fact that I have
crossed the
road outside my house thousands of times does not mean it is safe
either;
it just means I have been lucky so far.
Indeed. However you have not been expecting anyone else to be legally
responsible for getting you safely across the road before. This is what
you seem to be asking of the Transco engineer.
Post by John NagelsonIf I could believe in the existence of independent experts with no
financial
interest in reaching any particular conclusion, I would be happy to
pay
one say £20 to do a test. If anyone knows where I can find one, please
let me know. (Cloud cuckoo land, maybe?)
Call any gas safe engineer, and ask for them to come and test, and quote
for rectification.
Alternatively if you have the skills, and equipment, do your own test.
However, this is not rocket science - you already said you could smell
gas, so that alone is a pretty good clue that there is a leak. Now if
testing has confirmed that leak, then I would not act too surprised.
Post by John NagelsonThe whole set-up reminds me of how the association of electricity
supply
companies, many decades ago, obliged its members to pay something like
25% of their turnover (!!) to a public relations fund. People just had
to be
got to use electrical appliances. They could have given them away free
and still made a profit from their usage - it's like with inkjet
printers and
mobile phones. "Smell gas? Call us free!" indeed!!
With all due respect, bollocks.
Post by John NagelsonI went to the GasSafe site and it's full of scare stuff aimed at
elderly people.
In fact, starting at the front page of their entire site.
Perhaps so, but that is a different discussion.
--
Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/